Changes

==Moving <center>'''This page is now obsolete. It has been superceded by the search==[http://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum dedicated forum], so please go there!'''</center>

field a bit more to the <div style="margin-top of the left menu will be nice, so its easier to search articles without scrolling around. Hope you can do that PLEAAAASE :32px;text-) [[Useralign:Kangaroo|Kangaroo MusiQue of HJT]] 09center;padding:5px 0px 4px 0px;background-color:36, 5 August 2006 (CEST)#ffc0c0;border:1px solid #ffc0c0;">:That would be nice - I think it '''ATTENTION!'''<br />This talk page should '''only''' be higher, too. The problem is, this has to do with used for discussions about the skin, '''Main Page''' and Ithe '''Side Bar'''m not yet as comfortable with customising it... if someone knows how, <br />For general CPCWiki related discussions please step forward! use the [[User:Gryzor|GryzorDiscussion]] 16:48, 5 August 2006 (CEST)page.<br />:: so i now have moved the search field for the "monobook" template a bit up :) TO THE TOP :-D For suggestions of completely new sections and leaved the searchfield at the bottom also. If you wantfeatures, i can delete please use the search-field at the bottom later, to get things a bit thinner. [[User:Kangaroo|Kangaroo MusiQue of HJTSuggestions]] 16:10, 14 August 2006 (CEST)page.</div>

should be added, so upload of PDF and ZIP-Files will be possible. I Think a lot of manuals and stuff is in PDF-Format or some Freeware == Forum ==Today the [http:/ Shareware / Public Domain Programmes can be directly addes to the pages (Wanted to do that with the SOundtrakkr 128K)www. So cpcwiki.eu/forum Forum] opened its will be great if someone who reads something about a demo or programm also can download gates. I felt it was necessary because the discussion system of the DSK or whatever to run it on an emulator or cpcWiki is not adequate.: More file extensions allowed now. You can actually upload zip, rar (preferred due . It is not meant to better compression)replace every talk page, pdf and mp3 (but it's good for all those tape conversions!general discussion topics :). Nevertheless, can't a manual be copied as txt? [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 09:0006, 6 August 22 November 2006 (CESTCET):: THIS IS NOT!! working

==Adding templatesThere is a little problem with the pages linked only in the sidebar:==they only appear on the default mediawiki theme...There is a list here: [[special:lonelypages]]Link them from somewhere else :)

We should add some templates to mark articles for e.g. deletion. You can see the reason for the need for templates if you have a look at the article about [[Beau Jolly]]. You can find examples for that kind of templates in the original wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages).:Hmmm IAh yes, you'm not really sure what you mean... the Beau Jolly page is a harmless prank - at least re right and I consider have noticed it so at this point. If and when the wiki gets bigger and to such a size that systematic patrolling is needed, then myself - though I think we can start putting some mechanisms into place... For now, just reading the changes and glancing at the pages is surely enough? [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 14:07, 7 August 2006 (CEST)::I meant the template signs of Wikipedia to simply add warning, etc. Here is an direct example of some different marks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages/Disputes We don't need all signs, of course, but some to easily mark articles for deletion or for the need of an improvement know why anyone would be nice (no automatic robots - just to mark the articles). --[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 14:24, 7 August 2006 (CEST):::Ah, that's interesting now... I'll have to see how to implement them - unless you got use some idea? [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 14:53other theme, 7 August 2006 (CEST)::::I think they can just be added with copy & paste!? --[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 15:06, 7 August 2006 (CEST):::::I made a test with the [[Beau Jolly]] article. Unfortunately you can't do simple copy & paste because of all the internal links in the Wikipedia templates. Maybe someone can improve it. -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 16:57, 7 August 2006 (CEST):I would like to see templates for different categories of software ''e.g.'' games, demos, applications, like the information boxes one sees on Wikipedia for computer games - see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spindizzy_(computer_game) Wikipedia's entry on ''Spindizzy''] as an example. The problem for me at the moment this is that I don't know how to create complex tables and boxes in wiki markup at the moment! best by far :-( [[User:Nich|Nich]] 17:31D Anyhow, 7 August 2006 (CEST)::I added the template for the game info boxes ([[Template:Infobox CVG]]), but currently the "parser functions" like #if: don't seem m just waiting to work. --[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 18:44move servers, 7 August 2006 (CEST)::Ok, I found the page which explains the installation of the "ParserFunctions" extension. It have to be installed to get the template working: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ParserFunctions#Installation --[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 18:51, 7 August 2006 (CEST):::Mmmm just installed it -at least the relevant files. But, how about when this line:::: <pre>require_once( "$IP/extensions/ParserFunctions/ParserFunctions.php" );</pre>,:::it says it has to go to the end of LocalSettings.php. But if is done I do place it there (before the closing tag), it breaks the whole wiki'll look after such details... darn. Will try to look into it. thanks for pointing out!!! [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 2010:3203, 7 August 28 July 2006 (CESTCDT)

==MathAs I still don´t understand why we have two search windows I repeat the question if we really need them both? ;-) --[[User:==Villain|Villain]] 17:08, 28 August 2006 (CEST):Yup. The second one (the top one) was added when the sidebar was so tall that the lower search field was out of the screen. Now the sidebar is too short, but it will probably grow again.... [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 18:22, 28 August 2006 (CEST):: hey.. i'm just waiting for someone who tells me.. REMOVE THAT F*/&%NG second Search-Field and.. booom.. it will be gone :-D [[User:Kangaroo|Kangaroo MusiQue of HJT]]:::Hey Kanga, REMOVE THAT F*/&%NG second search field! --[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 21:04, 28 August 2006 (CEST)::::Don´t know if anybody else already told you but: REMOVE THAT F*/&%NG second Search-Field --[[User:Villain|Villain]] 21:09, 28 August 2006 (CEST)::::Ok, have noticed the Wink with the Zaunpfahl :-) and i will do my job tomorrow, if i find time :-):::::Ok, I removed it. Happy, y'all? :) [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 20:00, 29 August 2006 (CEST):::::Ahh Gryzor did it :) So what? [[User:81.90.35.80|81.90.35.80]] 11:20, 24 September 2006 (CEST)

Today I wanted to add some formulas (very simple!) to describe the mathmatic background of a routine. Are <math> Tags supported? --[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 21:18, 9 August 2006 (CEST):Which article did you edit? Can you try emailing me? You have not verified your email address == Mainpage and I can't send you an email... [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 10:06, 10 August 2006 (CEST)Sidebar ==

when tryig to add Regarding the main page, what's about redesigning it a PNG-File, there occurs an error saying that the png is not correct. Can you please check if PNG is enabled little bit in the wiki configuration. Thank you [[User:Kangaroo|Kangaroo MusiQue way of HJT]] 21:21, 9 August 2006 (CEST):Will look into it, I thought i had it fixed... [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 10:06, 10 August 2006 (CEST):: Darn... I canmost other Wikis like Wikipedia? The main page shouldn't get it to work! what has to be done is add this line to LocalSettings.php: $wgFileExtensions = array( 'png', 'jpg', 'jpeg', 'ogg','doc','xls','ppt','mp3','pdf' ); listing all contain the extensions you needcomplete site map... well, I changed LocalSettingslike the style of Wikipedia much more.php and also changed DefaultSettings.php (though not advisable), extensions are not blacklisted but it still won't work !! ARGH!!!! -- [[User:GryzorProdatron|GryzorProdatron]] 0816:4729, 11 29 August 2006 (CEST)

:Well, I differ in my opinion with yours. I don't like a big sidebar and prefer a good main page which can bring me directly to the different stuff in the Wiki, because you have much more room there to give a good entry point. Btw, I only use 1024x768 and I so I see it till "Software-Programming" in the sidebar (ok, will change if I get a new notebook someday ;)). Anyway, I will join the majority ==Main page). --[[User:==Octoate|Octoate]] 19:54, 29 August 2006 (CEST)

Yesterday, Kanga and me thought about how to do :::"Software-Programming" is your last visible entry? 8-O Maybe you choosed a good entry point for the articles font size of the Wiki 300% and came to installed the conclusion that the main page wastes too much space Google, Yahoo and MSN toolbars at the sidebar gets too big. If it same time? ;-)) My last entry is ok, I will think about a new design of the main page during the weekend and maybe prepare a first design under in the "Loose LemmasEditing help" article. --[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 10:09, 11 August 2006 (CEST):Basicallywell, I was thinking of creating text boxes on the main pagewith 1280x1024. That was my intention right from the beginningOk, and I thought I'd do it once there's enough stuff. I'm not too sure about how to shorten the sidebarcould be still optimized, though... [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 22:08, 11 August 2006 (CEST):: Just dont add the whole CPC Models again :-) summarize the stuff in maybe we can move "CPCAbout -Modelscontribute" and you won 4-Lines in to the Side.Bar [[User:Kangaroo|Kangaroo MusiQue of HJT]] 22:20, 11 August 2006 end (CEST):::Well, I know you're somewhat right, but I'd like to hope that by having them there would motivate someone to write something extensive on a single model... later on maybe I'll pull it in (probably two entries: CPC and CPC+/GX4000)... By the way, I've managed to tidy up the Sidebar a bit. [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 07:12, 12 August 2006 (CEST)::::Seems, that we can should be happy if someones writes an article for at least one model of also mentioned on the old generation CPCs ;-start page) As the hardware is nearly the same between the first 3 models, I think one article should be enough. I modified the sidebar a little bit and changed the font size of the remove "mono bookPD libraries" skin back to its correct size of 127%as an example (not so important for having an own entry point here IMHO). -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 1820:4726, 12 29 August 2006 (CEST)

:::: Here at work I think we shouldn't copy the links in the sidebar on the main pageuse 2560x1024, so there is no problem here. What's about sections like:* Welcome/Description* CPC scene news* CPCWiki related news* new articles (larger onesMaybe I will use a smaller font size and buy some glasses for my notebook ;-)* additional important links not listed in the sidebar-- [[User:ProdatronOctoate|ProdatronOctoate]] 1710:5552, 13 30 August 2006 (CEST)

Scene news would be very cool... Just talking with Eliot that there are still releases that keep quite unknown. This is because we still don´t have a point were really all CPC news are collected and available. The CPCwiki could become this point I think... --[[User:Villain|Villain]] 22:01, 14 August 2006 (CEST): The reason I dont know if people want rolled it back to get a "CPC Scene Wiki" :-) but i love to add more informations about scene members of expanded list (though I condensed the CPC but someone means models) is that ", if it's not hard facts" like that, then surely there's no reason in having a Sidebar? 8) Though I understand that on some resolutions (are only you really on the discussion page welcomed.. GRRR.. maybe i shall start a CPC-Scene-Wiki with some Klatsch & tratsch sections '''1024'''?? :-D )::If we already announce upcoming CPC parties it wouldn´t the entire SIdebar may not be bad to integrate all the other newsvisible, too. Just my point of view of course... ;-) --[[User:Villain|Villain]] 22:46, 14 August 2006 (CEST)I think that removing it altogether is much worse than having one that doesn't show in its entirety!

I had a few minutes, so I did this [http://www:: Oh come on.cpcscene.com/wiki.png little logo] for wich BAST)(&" has modified the wiki. Feel free Sidebar again to that really useless and annoying list of unwanted links :-D Why dont use it (or not). - Grim/Arkos: Very nice!: Hello matethe mainpage AND the SEARCH to find content, thanks for your effort! I'm afraid it's a bit too busyinstead of adding things wild, lacking a bit in coherence... I know mine is not very much cpc-related, so if you can improve yours... Cheers! unorganized and useless to the sidebar?? [[User:GryzorKangaroo|GryzorKangaroo MusiQue of HJT]] 2221:0849, 11 29 August 2006 (CEST)

Could we please stay with this usual format for talk pages? It is used in all the other Wikis, and as you see, there is a "+" function, which supports this format, too. Every new entry is placed at the end, not at the top. It is also more easy to jump into a section to continue the discussion there. Time by time the contributes can be moved into the [[Talk:Main Page/Archive1|archive]]. :::: =) -- [[User:ProdatronOctoate|ProdatronOctoate]] 1810:1952, 12 30 August 2006 (CEST)

While there are such few categories by now we should decide whether they should be in singular or plural now. ::::: Sounds good! -- [[User:YthcalProdatron|YthcalProdatron]] 1421:0858, 13 29 August 2006 (CEST)

==Languages ::::: It did it in this way and countries==moved "contribute" to the end. Is it better now? Btw, how can I clear the cache? -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 22:04, 29 August 2006 (CEST)

Please remember: Languages ::: The Bastard is me, I would guess. As I said, the reason for rolling it back is that under the short form, there is simply NO NEED for the sidebar. The sidebar is there for the reader to be able to navigate quickly to all parts of the wiki without having to go to the main page. It is NOT useless, certainly NOT unwanted (I use it all the time instead of the main page links) and countries are written ''I doubt it'uppers annoying -casethe space is empty if you don''' in English (egt put links there, so it goes wasted. The Main Page is NOT the place to put links on and is much harder to use than the sidebar. Unorganized? I wouldn'''G'''ermanyt think so - the structure is quite ok right now, if anyone can think of ways to improve it, please do step forward. It'''F'''rench)! -s not even wild, since it has been tamed a lot since its first appearance, and definitely not unorganized - see the little boxes that organise it? :p [[User:YthcalGryzor|YthcalGryzor]] 1709:2449, 14 30 August 2006 (CEST)

== Stubs New main page ==

Do very small I was so free and reorganized the complete main page into the usual "stubswiki style" make sense? I think not, as it's just disappointing to watch them. I tried to extend a lot of stubs, but again people are inserting useless 3 word entries - have a look at So the complete link list ("short pagesCPCWiki portal". It shouldn't be the goal to have as many senseless 3 word articles as possible but to create interesting information. What do you think?: I think ) has its necessarry to have such ages to have things in mind and to have a chance that someone can reown page now -edit the we should improve this page in knowing, its being that nearly all articels can be found there, instead of not remembering things. Sometimes it is very helpfull for me to find a short description about a group, a module directly or something and if i remember more i'll write it downindirectly.:: I also agree to Kangaroo, it's good to have already an entry, so that Regarding the new main page maybe we will not forget this subject. But we should can add a new category even more sections like "stubsarticle of the month", so that it's more easy to find these articles! or something like this. -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 1502:0840, 25 August 1 September 2006 (CEST)

Could anybody lock ::: I like the new layout as well, it's meaningful and nicely put, although I think it can use a little cleaning over time :) I'm a bit confused as to how news etc works, though, it currently seems to be all over the place and it's difficult to maintain it for someone who doesn't know exactly how... [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 20:37, 1 September 2006 (CEST):::: Regarding the news I will write a suggestion for the guidline how to insert new news. In general you have a headline, which have to be placed to the news (max 10 entries), the news archive (unlimited) and the main page (max 3 entries). The headline is the FutureOS article in it´s current versionname where you write the news itself + links to the source and the category (month). -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 20:58, 1 September 2006 (CEST) == Main picture of the main page ==Gryzor, why have you modified the photo of the main page with the ancient one ? If this wiki is related to cpc, i guess it's not only the cpc 464 and the whole cpc range is concerned...Almost the 464 photo seemd truncated and overlayed by a line. Longshot --[[User:195.154.167.66|195.154.167.66]] 14:53, 23 November 2006 (CET) You have reverted modification without any answer about my contrib here about that...I just see won't to waste time to update this picture again. Gryzor, you're the beginning main contributor of this site but i think your method is not fair, especially on a site built mainly by contributors.--[[User:Longshot|Longshot]] 13:17, 24 November 2006 (CET) : Well. I reverted it to the older version because I assumed there is something wrong with the image, that's all. For some reason the "range" photo won't appear, and I tried it fromt wo different computers and different browsers. Can you try reuploading the image under a new filename and changing the main page? Also, the 464 pic does appear fine for me - tried with Firefox, Opera, IE. As you can see it's not a matter of being 'unfair' - it's a technical issue, despite the fact that I like the 464 one better :):PS try to remember to log in before doing any changes.... :) [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 19:36, 24 November 2006 (CET) ::Sorry for the misunderstanding. About the range photo it's strange because i've any problem with ie or firefox (my personal pc) or crazy browser on my professional pc. This picture is a scan i'd modified in 2001 and coming from my site. I've compressed the picture with a newer version of image ready from 53kb to 29.2 kb and i try to upload it again under a new name. Please let me know if the problem occurs again...--[[User:Longshot|Longshot]] 11:46, 26 November 2006 (CET) ::: It appears ok now, but I´m sure how I scaled the thumbnail down a bit because it will endwas a big too big... thanks![[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 18:11, 26 November 2006 (CET) == CPC taking a day off == Is the CPC still in vacation? ;-) Maybe we could remove the picture, to make the info boxes below accessible in a better way again. Are maybe someone has an idea for an other cool frontpage motive? -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 22:36, 18 September 2007 (CEST)